Slut Shaming Saturday

THE JEZEBEL BRIGADE! (shame the sluts on the list...they need a bit of a reality check)

Why am I doing this? Because self-righteous people are a bane on good conversation. These people believe they're the only ones who can make threads and the only ones that have any worth and therefore are the only ones whose responses matter. This is proven in how they react to anyone new or different. And for those not listed here, you know it's true. 

FindingNamo - unable to appreciate their own heritage without hating on it and spiting on others. And is bound to live and die like Jezebel. YOU don't like me? Well let me be as uncreative and lame as Jezebel in all I do. Let me try and murder you, cause that is a justified way of dealing with people who don't like me. I, as a mature adult, have to react like an insane, hormonal freak of nature and then justify it by getting my other hormonal freaks of nature to follow suit. If that's not a slut, what is? 

Oh, and this person is super fake. Don't know what I mean, ask her. Fake. Fake. Fake as snow in hell. If anyone should apologize for anything it's her for lying to y'all. Search and ye should find.

Phyllis Rogers Stone - As perverted and disgusting as each of those names indicate and as high on himself as the last one would suggest. I'm wonderful and you're not. Oh, reasons? I don't need reasons, I'm douchey enough to say it and douchey enough to believe my own words. Yeah, don't waste your time considering my opinion, you might catch a mental disease that's as bad as the STDs I've racked up for myself.

haterobics - as wise as a dead owl that a fox took a massive dump on. Please believe that I care about how everyone feels and everyone thinks cause that's what my screen name means. It has nothing to do with the fact that it's aerobic for me to hate. Like oxygen for the douchey.

Jay Lerner-Z - Pretentious poster thinking he's posting anything worthy of knowing and it should be known cause he's the one that knows it. I can post definitions and then that's enough for you to understand I know how to copy and paste....I mean know what I'm posting about.

Jordan Catalano - As self-important and irrelevant as each of his post would have you believe. OHNOSE someone doesn't like me...they must be a stupid past poster I can't seem to get over. Self-important and irrelevant. Not to mention moronic.

Borstalboy - as clever as the name can't imply. Listen, I don't have a degree in anything outside of the word liberal, but I sure know how to tell if so one has mental issues. I won't use such great faux education on myself and diagnose me as having Douche-to-Mouth disease (douching to clean out what bile I've been saving in my rectal area and then drinking it so I can continue with my BS knowledge sharing).

South Florida - as boring as the name implies. Even the avatar is boring. This person needs a shot of smart and...well let's just start with smart. More of a coattail rider than anything. If she (I assume a lot cause it saves time...why waste anything as valuable as time on people who are as intolerant as the Nazis ever were...but they haven't killed anyone yet? Yeah, yet.) had a valid original thought...that would be original. But I don't believe that's possible for someone who comes up with a screen name like South Florida. HOLD the creative doors....

Dame -  seriously? This is the screen name you pick for yourself? Boring doesn't even begin to chip at the tip of this dull iceberg of a human being.

tazber -  just a little sheep. There, there sheep, you will be comforted by those you follow. You'll be lambchops soon enough. 

SmokeyLady - baabaa little sheep. The shear is going to pass your nappy self by. 

HorseTears -  More like croc tears. Was that boring? Well so are they. Who thinks Horse Tears is creative name? 

Threads the Jezebel Brigade ruins because they are bound by their own ignorance

Don't know how a baseball player is? Don't care to ask, just make stuff up and then when you're told you're wrong, complain about the people who know more than you cause you're embarrassed you're stupid about a topic. Everyone doesn't know everything, but at least have the balls to admit you were wrong instead demeaning a death cause it's not who you like. Forums that allow idiots like that to stick around and bully others like this are bound to fail. As that forum already shows, those three run around and post as if no one else can have an opinion outside of them. 

And the these people wouldn't know how to give good criticism if you taught them. They are that retarded. Ohnose they are offended cause someone used AIDs in a joke...morons. They go around and mock people for being different than them, but have the audacity to be offended over a silly (and accurate) joke on how some people use AIDs in acting. If they were actually as creative as this forum would indicate fans would be...they wouldn't have had an issue with that. They'd have stuck with comments of it last too long and explain where it could have been shortened. 

You can figure who isn't creative by how they criticize or (in the cause of the Jezebel Brigade) hate. For those that are creative actually appreciate parts of art no matter how much their taste is offended. There are times when the art isn't even art, so there's an argument there. But when all you do is attack Asians, as the Jezebel Brigade has a tendency to do, then you need to hide it better.

But the biggest load of ignorance is in a film none of them saw but all of them are going to whine about as if they have any idea about anything outside of their own bubbles they are suffocating in.  If learning were part of posting, everyone in that thread would be banned for not even attempting to do so. These posters would be the posters that would SPIT on a veteran as their kind did back during the Vietnam War. It's one thing to hate war, it's a totally different thing to hate on a person. It's just like when people get upset over a religion for hating (mainly hating on Christians instead of Muslims-- just as FindingJezebel  the coward couldn't point out in the France Terrorist thread) on homosexuals for their choice in sexual activity instead of the homosexual themselves. There is a difference in disliking an event instead of a specific person in the event or the action or the lifestyle (oh yes I did, get over it). 

So hate war. Hate it to death, but don't attack the soldiers in the war. They volunteered to do it. Demeaning them doesn't do anything good. But what should one expect from a group of intolerant cowards? 

Posts by the Stupids of the Jezebel Brigade (created by FindingJezebel herself)

Imagine hearing someone say the following things. And then ask yourself: would you really considering these people friend material? In the very least they could be better at insulting.   

If one is to think that they only did this to me cause, well, I was new (and that's what they do to new people..cause they are the most awful welcoming committee EVER), then how do they treat people they are familiar with in the forum sense?

They're so tolerant, let's all see how that tolerance works when they are set in FindingJezebel Mob Mode:

I didn't mention Reginald cause really, who does?

Life is simple. If you are tolerant and accepting of people, then you will show it in any part of your life. There are no exclusions. It's the small matters that matter. You can spout off all this talk about how you stand up for those that are in the minority and then if you are like KAD (mentioned further down) all you do is coware in the background until the damage is done and then you come out and point fingers and say, "OMG that's so wrong. You shouldn't be doing that." The brave stand up when they have the most to lose, not after everything has fallin'. The smallest of areas is an online forum. If you stand by and watch a group attack anyone and do nothing cause you don't wanna catch their ire, then you're just as much a problem as they are. Words are far worse than punches. Not to even mention if you stand by when words are being exchanged, there's no way you'd be brave enough in real life to stand up for someone when fists are flying.

Those who marched for Civil Rights marched together against a bigger threat and they knew that if they did certain PEACEFUL marches that they were walking into hatred, but they didn't coware. They didn't back down. And those who attacked them were a brigade of hatred. They were only following orders. They were doing as they were told and at the time they were the majority mindset. They, as a group with weapons, attacked those that had none. It's same when someone walks up to someone they don't like with their group of friends. Five on one. The four hold the one while the boss beats him down. It's cowardly. It's just like the Jezebel Brigade. They attack like a pack of wolves without a sense of care as if they're not even dealing with humans. And that should scare EVERYONE on this forum. THAT mindset is the worst kind of mindset in human history.

You should always nip that mindset in the bud. Don't let it grow. But it's a tad too late, here. Their weeds are infesting what could've been a beautiful garden.

No one should be tolerant all the time. But if you're going to sit there and claim you are and then you treat the different with hatred, then you're the problem you claim not to like. And those problem posters are listed above. ALL of them go and attack people and then act as if they have done nothing wrong. They act as if in some odd way their attacking is a HOLY act and that they are justified in their actions.

They are not justified.

The news articles that talk about bullying state it's people who post the above things that are the problem. They create mobs online and then go after people who are not like them. Then when something awful happens they step back and state that they're just words and they didn't mean to cause any harm.

The difference between me and them is that I'm ten million times more creative and ten million times more sane. Crazy people need a group to latch onto and agree with them so that the mean things they're saying are justified. This allows them to attack, bash, kick people when they're down (physically...like a sick, twisted mob attack like at a McDonald's--google it) without feeling like they're doing anything wrong. They need their group. Their gang. Their mob. Their brigade. Like the SS. Like the Stasi. It was ONLY ORDERS those wonderful, evil Nazis would state. IT'S ONLY WORDS is no different in the attempt to justify your actions. Take responsibility for your lack and be better.

"NEVER, EVER mention Nazis. It kills debate." No, it does not. What kills debate are those that run from a discussion or shun it cause they don't like what the other person has to say. The problem isn't what's said, the problem is people don't tend to listen or read and because of that things deteriorate into doucheyland where the Jezebel Brigade feels at home. Anything can be discussed, it's just a matter of how the topic is broached. It is not a matter of merely mentioning it. Nazis aren't an issue and shouldn't be on a blacklist because someone gets all uneasy when they're used. The reason people don't like discussing them isn't because they feel uncomfortable, it's because they're ignorant on what Nazis actually are. They are far more than just killing. Killing was the outcome of their policies and procedures. Their killing wasn't the start and so when someone mentions them, it very well could be that the situation warrants it. That the situation is a warning that this person or group are walking a worn path history has already proven is bad. And instead of shutting down conversations like that, one should figure out why they think that and if it's bred out of ignorance, correct them. But you actually have to know how to correct without turning into the Jezebel Brigade where you just punch someone and say OMG you're stupid.

Forums die because of people like this. They scare off new people (which y'all don't have, cause if you did...there wouldn't be dead time cause the Jezebel Brigade isn't posting) and eventually the forum starts to shrink.

I've seen it happen to two sites. They didn't have a popular news side, though. So that's probably the only saving grace for this site. If it weren't for that the Jezebel Brigade would have killed this place long before I even created an account.

What can you do to make the forum better? Complain about the above people any chance you get and stand up to their bullying. Just cause they post in a mobish manner doesn't in anyway make any of the people above right in anything they have to say. And trust me, most of what they have to say is so wrong anyone with an ounce of knowledge on the topic would eviscerate them.

ABOVE ALL do NOT trust that FindingJezebel (or as you know this thing: FindingNamo) is real. Faker than a fake tan on the Jersey Shore. Shame the slut any chance you get.

Oh and Kad:

He should get his balls back from whoever snipped them off. Good grief, what a massive shrew of a person. If you actually fought back against what you believe is wrong, you'd be a better person for it. But it appears you'd rather be accepted than fight against bullies. 

My Terrible Experience at the Santikos Palladium

I went to a Santikos Theater called Palladium and had a wonderful incident. I wore face paint and was asked by the management to wash it off because it was scaring people. I complied. After I washed it off and sat back down the management team asked me to just come back at another time. They refunded my money and gave me a rain check.

This is the email I wrote to the Palladium.

Dear Sir or Madam, 

I am Japanese. Hence the last name Kobayashi. Big Hero 6 has Japanese themes in it. Namely the Kabuki mask used by the villain. It does not mean bad. It’s a theater mask. Every Friday I facepaint because it’s fun and this Friday I decided to do something Japanese and chose to do the Kabuki Mask from Big Hero 6 (a film you show in your theaters). If you do not know what a Kabuki mask is here is a link and if you would like to see a picture from Big Hero 6.

I do not get to do many things that are Japanese, so it was a special day today. 

As I have done before I decided to go to the movie theater and watch Mockingjay with my Kabuki facepaint. Moments before the film starts I’m asked by your staff to please come with them. They explained that people were afraid of my facepaint and asked if I could wash it off. I explained that I’ve done this before, wore facepaint to the theater and they had no problem. They had nothing to say to that and just insisted that I wash it off. I agreed to wash it off. I was very offended that I would have to wash off my heritage to appease people’s prejudice, but I did. Upon doing that they allowed me back to my seat...only one of the management team came back and asked me to leave as he mentioned the Colorado shooting as a reason.

The Colorado guy didn’t come into the theater and sit with any facepaint. Nor did he calmly leave. He came in shooting people. I don’t understand how I’m anywhere close to being that person when I wore my Japanese theater facepaint in a theater.

I hope the people that complained don’t go and see Big Hero 6. I wouldn’t want them to be freaked out by another culture.

I was refunded my money and given a pass, but that doesn’t fix being told to wash my face off to remove my Japanese heritage and then told to leave anyway.

I have never felt so humiliated and insulted than I did tonight. I am Japanese and had I been sitting with those who were also Japanese...they wouldn’t have complained about me. They would have started a conversation with me and we would be talking about the mask itself. So those that complained about what they saw acted out of prejudice more than they acted out of any care for anything else. And it’s unfair that I had to suffer humiliation due to someone not understanding what a Japanese Kabuki mask is.

I hope I’m able to return to your theater that I really, really like without feeling as if I’m unwelcomed because I am not the same color or the same in any fashion as others that complained.

Again, (because I have sent an email before stating how great your staff is) I would like to say that your staff (not the management staff at all) who handle customer service, tickets and concessions...all the teenagers have never, ever made me feel unwelcomed. If only the adults could learn a lesson or two from them.

I am going to go back and use my pass. I am going to watch Mockingjay, but I don’t know if I could go back after that. I don’t even know if Mockingjay will be forever tainted by this event...that every time I hear or see it I think about how I was treated for not being like everyone else because I’m Japanese and they are not.

Jay Kobayashi (do not be afraid, Kobayashi just means small forest)


HERE is the reply

Mr. Kobayashi,

I am very sorry that you had this experience at the Palladium. At Santikos we do value every guest and strive for the highest quality experience for each guest. A general manager is often called upon to make difficult judgment calls when guests have conflicting expectations. This was unfortunately the case with your experience last evening. We do hope you will return and have many other positive experiences at the Santikos Palladium.


Thank you.General Manager

My Reply:


Mr. General Manager,

If the policy is not to have face paint, then there should be a sign. Also that should include hats and hoodies, seeing how I was also wearing a hoodie. Not to mention any costume, because we wouldn't want to upset any of the old people who decide to see a war movie about kids dying. Which would mean the teenager that saw Mockingjay today dressed in a Hunger Game's costume should have been asked to leave. Maybe I should have complained because I'm sure I could find something offensive about her wearing that. As in it offended my sense of taste. Then there's the horror trailer that came on before the film...that too should be removed due to it also might frighten someone.

If we are to limit our view of others to the small fraction of people who can't handle something different, we are bound to have nothing fun left. It is the rule of the business to have no face paint, that's fine. But said business has NO sign that says such. And if face paint is offensive to some, then makeup is offensive to others. No woman should be allowed to wear makeup. It frightens me. For God knows how unattractive they might look without it.

Even at that theater the employees dress up on occasion, is that to stop because someone might be afraid one of your staff is dressed up like a big box of popcorn? They might have an addiction to popcorn and seeing it that big in their face might make them fall off the corn wagon.

The problem wasn't that I was asked to wash my face, it was the manner it was done. It was insulting and the fact that whoever complained got what they wanted made it worse because they got to see it and feel as if they were justified in their asinine behavior. If I was as bad as I was lied about, treating me the way I was treated would have made matters worse. I have respect for people and their job far more than the need to set a bunch of old people in their place.

The other problem was telling me to wash my face and then telling me to leave anyway. What logic was behind that? I don't think there was much going on there.

And if that becomes the policy of no face paint or costumes (cause the fear it might cause those that hate anything that isn't as boring as they are) then how are you to handle the slew of superhero films to come? Especially Avengers Age of Ultron.

If you'd be so kind to give me the corporate information. I'm more mad now than I was last night.

Thank you,

Mr. Kobayashi

/end

And that was that. I called their corporate phone number and left a message. I have not received a reply email and I'll update if I get a return call tomorrow. This is all, for now.

Pebble into Jupiter by Nate the CondescenKing

Joey Graceffa is a YouTuber whose personality is a magnet attracting people to view his videos about his life. He uses words like SLUT which causes some people to feign insulted. OHNOSE, he calls people names. Something people never, ever do…ever. Woopty-do. I call people whores. It’s like saying someone’s stupid. Sometimes you mean it. Sometimes you’re being facetious.

Nate Clark is one of those feigners.

Joey’s video talking about his car being stolen vs Nate’s feigning over being insulted and why he’s jealous.

If you’re wondering how to create Jupiter from a pebble, ask Nate. If you’re wondering how to make the best tasting lemonade you’ve ever had, ask Joey. He made that comment after several thousand insults that ranged from Joey being gay to Joey needing to kill himself (who knows how many he read or if he read any at all). He had one single response with a well-placed grin. It comes from this video. 

Joey has a great sense of humor that’s shown in how he reacts to being towed. I work with a tow company, and tow trucks call cops to inform them of a tow, because owners automatically think that their car was stolen. A natural reaction.

If someone is talking about you and you don’t appreciate it, you pull them aside and tell them you don’t appreciate it. You don’t collect everyone into the Town Square and announce that you hate the person with a condescending tone. A douchebag would and, like Nate, make a video claiming they were insulted. Not to mention having every right to get the car towed.

First let me take the “insulting.”  In order to insult someone, you have to actually use their name or use some form of subtly that indicates the person. If you don’t indicate who it is, then you’re speaking in generalities. People do that when they’re in the car, and someone cuts them off. They scream a name at them, toss up their hands or do some vile gesture. The reaction to the cutting off isn’t personal. It’s an in general reaction to the abrupt situation.

Nate attacked Joey specifically. Nate said Joey’s name. Nate talked down to Joey without a hint of subtly as if Joey wasn’t any smarter than trash at the bottom of his high horse’s hooves. Nate sharing Joey’s income was a douchebag move because that’s what douchebags do. He tried rallying everyone to target the person he’s targeted. This garnered Nate a lot of attention. Something he really, really wanted.  What better way to get that attention than taking on someone that has a lot of subscribers? Not only take Joey on through kicking him like a bum a snooty person hates, but have your video posted to Reddit and 4Chan and other whore sites so as to get attention for your supposedly altruistic deed.

Now about the right to tow. You have no right to tow. That’s because you have no right to drive. You have no right to a car. You have no right to a house. You have no right to a driveway. A right is equal to not having to purchase. It’s already yours. Such as free speech. You don’t have to purchase that. Making it yours. It’s a right. In order for Nate to have the right to tow he’d have to have been given the car, the house and the entire driveway without a single dime in payment to anyone, even the government via taxes. Actually we’d have to all be given that without payment for it to be a right. Since that ain’t happening, it’s not a right.

So, Nate didn’t have the right to tow. He had the legal right to tow…which is not the same as having the right to tow. Legal is used in court. It doesn’t matter elsewhere. Confused? Let me enlighten you with some historical facts. Legally cities were allowed to separate blacks and whites on buses, restaurants, restrooms, hospitals and such. Legally you can be arrested if you’re 18 for having sex with a 17 year-old (no matter if you’re boyfriend and girlfriend) and be charged with statutory rape AND be on the sex offenders list. Legally women were not allowed to vote. Legal isn’t a good argument for right/correct/without fault. Legal is only an argument in court, not for making a YouTube video demeaning someone so you can get attention, Nate.

Nate is a douchebag CondescenKing. There’s no two ways around his egotistical, inflated head. With people like that, they need a mob to nod in agreement in order to feel validated in what they believe no matter if it’s a lie. A mob. A zombie horde. A Borg collective. Whatever you call it, that’s what Nate needed. And got. Each thumb-up was proof people cannot think for themselves, let alone separate themselves from the bully. Nate is a bully. Proof’s in the creation of the video. The question that needs to be answered is what was Nate’s endgame? What did he want to accomplish with this video? If it’s the attention he got, (which it was) then he was being a bully. If it’s to embarrass Joey, (which it was) then he was being a bully. If it was to come off smarter than anyone who thought he was a douchebag, then he was being a douchebag.

It doesn’t matter if Joey parked illegally. That, in no way, justifies what Nate created…a sardonic storm of brutish, pernicious malice that tried to rain on Joey’s pleasant personality that has harmed no one in any of his videos. Something Nate cannot ever say.

Finally saying that you enjoyed the video because Nate made you laugh is, quite simply, backing a douchebag. In order to suggest that the video was done with humorous intent, it would have to be proven that laughter is the only viable reaction to the video. It isn’t as proven by the previous paragraphs as well as the posts in both videos’ comment sections. Nate didn’t create the video to tell people to attack Joey, but he’s never denounced any of the vicious comments that were made in his video comment section or that of Joey’s. Meaning he agrees with the insults. One cannot say the same about Joey’s fans, because Joey’s video didn’t name Nate or insult him personally. The fans of Joey were reacting to what Nate did and what his lovers had posted. If Nate never made a video, Joey’s fans wouldn’t have ever known who Joey was talking about and therefore couldn’t make any comments about Nate or his lovers.

Speaking of people that back Nate’s video because they laughed… Phillip DeFranco Show’s view on it  – this is only relevant because of the hypocrisy. You cannot be for NOT bullying, but be okay with it when it’s a byproduct of a video you endorse because you chuckled at what you claim is clever (even though it’s far from it). Nate’s video could not produce good. No reality that spans the space time continuum would have a good outcome of this douchebag CondescenKing’s video. Backing it is backing the comments that were tossed out against Joey. And that’s why Phil is wrong. I mostly disagree with him on several billion things because he’s too mushy and less logical, but his show is well done and enjoyable. Especially when he’s not talking about political things he doesn’t really get.

Tre C. B.’s response is the kind of clever Nate was trying to go for, but failed epically. And I can say that because when you get viral like Nate’s video, it’s not because it’s clever, it’s because it was mean enough for the simple minded to latch on to. Ooh if it was truly clever, it would take people a moment to actually appreciate what’s going on instead of going OMG ooh snap. When you say ooh snap, yeah…it’s as clever as a your mama joke. Which isn’t clever.

If you leave with anything that improves you, leave with the view of abstaining from group think. Don’t ever be in a group that’s jeering an individual to the brink of asking them to kill themselves. No one deserves to be attacked by a mob no matter what they’ve done. Justice has never been handled at the hand of an angry group of people. Not one single time in all of history can you name such a moment. Don’t be historically stupid.

Can I post here? Why…yes I can. 

Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins!

Should the Washington Redskins change their name? No.

Why?

I'm half Japanese and half Irish. People that get Japanese characters tattooed on their body are offensive. If you can't speak the language, don't desecrate it by placing it on your sagging boob, poorly developed tricep or that torso that used to look better when you swam in high school twenty dozen moons ago.

Fighting Irish is offensive. I don't fight everyone. I hate when I tell someone I'm half Irish and they ask me if I want to fight and when I say no, they ask if that's the Japanese side speaking. Morons are offensive. Put them all in a concentration camp and gas them. Get a bunch of lactose intolerant people to crop-dust, it'll save on money.

While we're on the topic of what offends me, let me say how awful the term WHITE House is. As half white I find the name of said house fully vile. It's not really white anyway. It's like flat white and everyone knows flat makes everything useless. Flat chest. Flat butt. Flat crotch. All kinds of uselessness in those. Go ahead and count the ways.

Are we still on the topic of offensive? Yes, because it's my article. New Orleans Pelicans. Seriously? Totally offends my creativity. Get rid of it.

UNCF is offensive because of the N-word. It is a N-word, but is it THE N-word? I don't care. All N-words are offensive. Nothing good starts with N.

What else is offensive enough to change so I don't have to deal with it? I'm pissing out a Mississippi River of whining. It's a torrent of asparagus smelling raging spray. Except I haven't eaten any asparagus. The taste offends me.

Speaking of taste: Eskimo pies. Sounds like cow pies. That's just awful. Why would anyone name something in a similar light? Like gross twins. Evil, I tell you. Just evil.

Urbandictionary.com is offensive. Anyone with any sense of moral right knows that. SHUT IT DOWN. They should be renamed to Nutsandberriesdictionary.com. Totally on point. Since PeTA thinks it should be the Washington Potatoskins. Considering how intelligent and smart PeTA is, I don't understand why anyone would deem that a stupid suggestion.

On the topic of stupid suggestions…actually nah. I've grown bored of this topic. But before I go I will give a list of things that are offensive and if you don't know why, it doesn't matter. Your opinion doesn't matter. Only those that are offended matter and as you sit all comfortable knowing you are okay with certain things, your world will change because all it takes is a militant (with weapons or ideas) minority to destroy everything due to them being offended.

If Washington Redskins changes because of pressure to do so, what's stopping these angry little Indians from going around causing more ruckus elsewhere?

Indiana. The state. Look it up.

Atlanta Braves. Really? You think they're safe?

Kansas City Chiefs. Not safe either no matter what your little liberal wet blankets say.

Cleveland Indians. Yap.

Los Angeles Angels. Oh, sorry, if you're a Christian you can't be offended. Pardon me.

Minnesota Vikings. Hahaha, right. White people can't be offended. Never.

Dallas Cowboys. Same as above. What was I thinking?

Giving in to people who are offended is like calling a personal foul in basketball for a player that is always faking hurt…always falling on the ground seconds before they're touched…sliding across the floor in agony, but able to get up and shoot those shots for some points. Allowing the offendants to get their way when they're not even really hurt allows them get their way when they're not even really hurt. So these offendants know they can do it again. And again. And again. And again.

And those that sit by nodding their head that this is so offensive and awful and that Indians should be listened to, well…your world sucks. Must be really difficult to walk around on eggshells all the time offending PeTA (the master offendants) as you kill unborn chickens, not to mention vegans (offendants to the nth) don't necessarily like you either. Neither do I. Clean up your eggshells and go home.

Reddit

Reddit is fun, until you hit places like /r/politics where echo chamber was born. It's one of the worst places on the internet. Seriously, how could anyone get any real info off /r/politics? They can't.

You might ask Reddit what they're about and they'd lie. Read this instead. Reddit. 

And a great breakdown (though old) of what the subreddits are like. 

Authonomy on Encyclopedia Dramatica

Oh I laughed a good laugh reading this.

I'm not the only one that has a list of douchebags from that site.

The Gay Hitler's Idiot's Guide to Tolerance

I'm not supposed to mention Hitler in a debate because of a douchebag named Godwin who egotistically named a law after himself. Too bad. Not mentioning Hitler allows people to act like him and not get called out on it. It's amazing that Dan Savage cares enough to tell those who are bullied for their sexuality that “things get better” and yet when things don't get better quick enough for him, he calls on the power of Hitler (as if Hitler were Captain Planet) to vent his frustration. His speech was very similar to how Hitler spoke about different view points. How they are vile and need to be removed.

I bet if a group of atheists went around burning Churches Gay Hitler (Dan Savage) would look the other way. Just like the women groups ignore any crude comment that is made about conservative women. And on that rare occasion that they stand up for conservative women, they do it with a caveat of how they don't agree with them. No one asked if you agreed with them. The pejorative term used is what needs discussed, not if the person is upstanding in your opinion. Quite frankly anyone who claims to fight for one group of people are bias losers anyway, so no one should want them in their corner. They are not looking out for your best interest. They are looking out for the best interest of the group. They make matters worse. Like GLAAD. Or PeTA. Or NAACP.

If Gay Hitler (Dan Savage) really cared about things getting better, then he would treat others who have different view points...better. He wouldn't care what's believed unless those that believe (such as WBC [those wonderful people that Freedom Caring Canada ban from entering their country...just another liberal hypocrite in action] who spout hateful things during funerals) are trying to destroy people. Then it's worth standing up against and telling them they are being vile because they are going directly against the teachings of Christ about love.

Instead Gay Hitler (now I don't have to say his name...connection) decides to preach to high school journalist about what he hates. Now that's how to show tolerance. He should write an idiot's guide. He didn't allow them to speak up for what they believe in. He decided to scream at them and call them names for choosing to walk out on his tirade. That is what the left always wants. Why don't you turn the other cheek. That they did and yet the left still went after them. I say the left because they are defending his vile actions because they love to hate.

Liberals swear they're tolerant and then they back a Gay Hitler, totally destroying this idea they care about how others are treated. I suppose they only care if those who are mistreated are those who think just like them. It is best to only stand up for those that agree with you, because that's how to be tolerant. So says the Gay Hitler's Idiot's Guide to being Tolerant.

I'm not even going to get into the fact that Gay Hitler misused the Bible through his childish rant about how he didn't like a book that he doesn't believe in because it doesn't like his lifestyle choice. He honestly believes that there should be a law saying everyone has to love all gay people or you'll be hated on by the tolerant left. That Idiot's Guide is writing itself. They are not all likeable. Therefore they don't deserve to be liked just because they're gay. It's not like Gay Hitler likes Christians. He displays in that video that he hates them. For someone to advocate that tolerance is the answer to show intolerance is painfully funny. Idiot's Guide Gold.

And if you want everyone to like you, Gay Hitler, you are in for a rude awakening. For you it no longer gets better. After this, it gets worse and that's not because Christians are (as you suggest) intolerant due to their beliefs. It's because you're intolerant due to your hate. It's because of people like you that gays have it rough. You are not likeable, which is exactly what you need to be when you are promoting tolerance.  

Current TV Failure

And it looks like their business practices are catching up to them and Current TV will eventually fail. And I will be there to laugh in their face.  Because they suck and failure is all they will ever be good at.

Will320069 is a dirty Old Man

I have posted on www.student.com forums since 2004.

Ever since I said that Will320069  flirts with girls who were underage, he was out to get me. If I weren't telling the truth he wouldn't have to attack me. He'd just have to let the evidence speak for itself. I only said it once and I said it to someone in private. But he couldn't do that. Search his screen name and you'll see that he flirts with girls. A lot. Right now the pickings are slim and there are no young ones he can swindle with his nasty words, so you won't find anything recently. And most of his nasty comments have go away due to how the website removes posts after a certain amount of inactivity. But I did search and found some that are good enough, but not as bad as he had gotten at one point.

When you're 28 and flirt with a girl that's 19, that's creepy. He flirted with girls that were 16 when he was 22. That's disgusting. If you find nothing wrong with that, well you don't have a daughter or you're just as dirty as Will. There is no reason for a 22 year old to flirt with a 16 year old girl online in front of the world. If that's what he said in public, one shouldn't even imagine what he said in private.

I wouldn't be surprised if Will had a record. But that's not something Jeff checks into when he hires mods.

Jeff is the owner and he could care less about how mods treat anyone. It took him ages to realize that a certain mod by the name of Adam was bad. He was told that Adam was bad. But he didn't do anything about it and Adam went on a tirade and deleted so much stuff that it most likely forced some posters to leave.

In 2005 the forums were bustling with new people and it was fun.

In 2005 Darphabobo took a prank too far and because he quoted me in the forums Jeff blamed me for something someone else did. It didn't matter if I said I didn't do it. It didn't matter I had nothing to do with it. It didn't matter that he had no proof or that what proof he had came from Will who had a history of not liking guys who stood up to him. This is why he doesn't talk to any guy. As long as he can control their thinking and keep them thinking he's smart, then he'll speak with them. That's why the two mods in BS are mods with him. They'll abide by how he runs things and won't think for themselves. And if you search their names on the BS forum, you'll see that they never confront Will when he's being dirty, nasty old man.

In 2006 Jeff allowed another crazy person to run around and do and say whatever he wanted. Seren_dipity  and in February he deleted an entire thread that was 10,000 pages under his boyfriend's (Sn0wman) profile name that was mod at the time. Neither Sn0wman or Seren_dipity got into trouble for their actions. That's a big thing on a forum...deleting people's posts in mass.

Jeff has a knack for befriending crazy people online and acting as if they're not crazy.

There was a poster by the name of Phoenix_89 who told everyone he was 16. He wasn't 16. He was more like 14 or something and he got to be mod and friends with Jeff. When it came out he lied, Jeff didn't care. And if he did, he didn't do anything about it.

I say that because whenever he was upset with me, the entire site knew because he couldn't help but spread it around like herpes.

Then there's Crosstheline who told everyone that he was a boy only years later to find out that he was a she the entire time. That's not a big deal if she told the truth the first time, but she lied and she was mod and she was friends with Jeff and Jeff didn't do anything about that one either. Not to mention a guy like him as a guy and then liked him as a girl. Go figure that one. Someone lies like that you gotta be a loon to fall for them.

Under all that crazy, I have great reason to question why Jeff gets upset over anything that I do. He couldn't list one thing that he's ever gotten upset with me over that is remotely close to what the above people have done or continue to do.

When he tells me I've said something wrong, I've asked what is wrong with what I've said. He doesn't ever have an answer outside how it makes other people feel. The question then is who made them think like that? Who trained them that it as okay to treat me like that? Jeff. He is upset with me because people view me as he wants them to view me? Exactly how is that my fault? How is that not retarded? How hard is it to tell people to get over not liking an opinion? He's babied several posters and now he has a site that's mainly brats.

This is another liberal ran website that tries and shuts people down if the owners don't agree with them. How can they seriously go about their lives claiming to want equality and fair treatment of people when they can't even do that on a simple little webiste?

If you profess that you're one thing (such as tolerant), most likely you're not.

When you accept the behavior you find abhorrent only because the behavior is against whom you dislike…it makes you the problem you abhorre.

If I were terrible, Jeff would have removed me along with Darph the first go around. But I wasn't terrible. He has some form of guilt for lumping me together with what he knew was wrong and that guilt has ate at him for the longest time and I play on it whenever I can. If I don't, he'll forget how wrong he's been and that cannot be allowed.

This is the man that allowed people to state I was a pedophile without any proof. He just let people say it. He even joined in the conversations. What kind of man runs a “student” website and allows a pedophile on? What kind of website owner for “students” lies about someone being something that they're not? The same kind of person that can't tell if someone's lying to him over gender or age.

Due to trusting the very ones who are negative and intolerant, he’s created a website that bleeds members. The mass exodus happened in the summer of 2006 when he allowed lies about me being a pedophile spread unquestioned and he never, ever redacted it or put those who said it in trouble. Some of them are still mods like Will320069, Greentutrle and for a long while, Bat.

If you go to Random Random or Ran Dumb, you can see how much fun it use to be. It's not totally seen in these threads, because these threads were deleted and the replacements' first few pages are on that topic, but once that passes, you can see how much fun it was. And for a while it lasts until the summer '06 when Jeff and Will320069 create a witch hunt out of nothing for me.

A question is why would I stick around if I was being mistreated? It’s like you finding a home you like and buying it. For years you care for it as your house and can’t think of another place to live. Then one neighbor starts to hate you for no reason. This bully neighbor gathers other neighbors together to hate on you as well. In total there’s five of them causing problems by talking trash about you. They claim no one wants you in the neighborhood any more. There are 100 other people that live there, but most of them are silent. Several don’t speak up. Instead of siding, they decide the peace of the neighborhood is gone, so…so are they. They move. The head of Home Owner’s Association blames you for all the problems, never once considering the bully neighbor as an issue. Anything you say to the bully neighbor is considered as an act of defiance and you are punished for it. After investing so much money and time into your home, do you up and leave or stay and fight?

I'm fighting. And in the next few posts I'll show you want is allowed to stick around while what I say is questioned as crass, mean and hateful.  

Heavy Dose of Great Humanity

This is where I post my happy thoughts and things that make me giggle. 'Cause it ain't going in this blog, that's for sure.

My Tumblr. Fun times. I hope.

Douchebag Racist of the Moment

What a douchebage racist. 

"(He said) that Jews control the government and that you need to be their friends in order to be successful, that Jews control the media. To me, that was just so hateful and horrible," said Noah Ickowitz, a UC Berkelely ASUC Senator.
"This is not hate, this is actual facts," Farrakhan said. 

Who listens to this fool?

Facts happen to be backed by more than emotional anger. In this day and age that's all people are putting stock in, emotional facts. Facts that are created by someone's immature emotional state. Sad that that's how things have fallen. This world is in the hands of the inept.

Broken People Live in Detroit

If you don't like the price of condoms, go buy them from somewhere else. If you're going to trash someone's store, then you risk your life. Because gas station clerks don't mess around. Nor should they have to. So this fool died for condoms. Broken.

As I've said, constantly, Detroit needs to just be abandoned. It sucks. So does DC and so does Chicago. Let them all just waste away. The thugs have taken over, anyway.

The Broken People of the Moment

Another case against excessive drinking. I do know morons who drink until they pass out and act as if it's okay. Drink a lot. HEY I gots a cannon. Let's play. Aim it at the trailer (oh, yeah...it was a trailer) and FIRE! Oh, and forget that your wife is inside. WOOHOO...now that's a mess you have to deal with for a while. That and being the but of the jokes.

Next we have a family that allows their children access toreally powerful magnets. SO powerful that they just tear you up if you swallow…I don’t know…say 30! Seriously. What is wrong with people? I don’t understand the appeal of magnets. Wouldn’t they taste metallic and nasty? Nothing like candy.

"This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy."

Had that been a black child set on fire, the nation would be ablaze. But since it's just a white kid, it all right. Ain't no one going to shed a tear for a little ol' white boy. Certainly not anyone who is a liberal. It makes me sick that such people exist. Setting someone on fire takes too much hate. Enough that if you do something like that, what right do you have to live?


I need a heavy dose of great humanity. Maybe I got some....

Promotional Suck: People

The following people's online personalities make an online living as liars.

The following people are from Authonomy. These people claim to be writers. As with many things the world over there are good and there are bad. The following is the list of the bad. The bad writers not bad writing. Sure they might write well, but being a douchebag and a good writer isn't a very good combo, now, is it? Click on their links and you will be brought to their works and you can judge for yourselves. Judge the liars of Authonomy. Good liars make good writers? Yeah, right.

Not only are they douchebags, but liars. Liars because they choose to use lies to spread about people they do not know. And in doing so cause more damage in their wake than they care to admit to. And when that sort of online play is flipped on them, they cry like little British Pussy Cats. Sissies, if you will. Even if they are American, they're the weaker counter parts by their shining personality. Especially if they are a pig from Florida.

Published (as we know with Twilight) doesn't a good writer make. I'm pretty sure you've read some duds in your day and some in your future.

Groaner 

Who happens to be the first on the list? Groaner the dictionary name stealing pig. Though originality isn't with him in name, it is also not with him in humor. Might as well prepare yourself to be underwhelmed with his comedic flaws. Do enjoy reading his book. I'm sure it'll bring out the swine in you.

William Holt

As you'll see William is the douchebag name of the century. This William misuses the idea “Thought Crime” in such a manner that one would have to call him a liar if he ever said he read “1984”, cause there is no way. Look at what he writes about thought crime. He might as well be writing about how the 1900 Galveston Hurricane was just a bunch of wind. I don't know which is worse a creatively retarded English Professor or a Mentally Deficient Engineer (John Booth). Based on his idea of what makes a good thread the English Douchesser could be the winner if I would call it that. But I don't. I call it the loser of the losers. Read the pitch for “Faust's Butterfly” cause it shows you how into himself he is. Only an English Professor could write something so wordy. That's not a pitch, that's a mini book. The badge of honor on the book is a bad mark for the one that handed it over. Really, who would vouch for something so hollow other than a fellow hollower? 

That pretty thread he mentions Authonovillains had someone saying how good it was. He took half a word and mashed it with a whole word. It's no more creative than taking two pieces of bread and putting them together using peanut butter. If you're that amazed by that not cool combo then I have some ocean front property in Arizona. And based on your lack of finding what's creative and original you should buy that hook, line and sinker without smelling the cliché...which you can't anyway seeing how William Holt uses it as chloroform to get people to fawn over his not-wit.

John Booth

"Shaddowdon" has this lovely bit: "Peters looked to his colleagues for support. Bishop Peters was a big man who seemed to fill the room with his presence."

Bishop Peters mentioned first and then state Peters as the shorter name. He reverses it. Why? Because Booth is British and as a British person he thinks he knows everything and in knowing everything he proves he knows nothing. How that whacked out HarperCollins reviewer didn't catch that just shows what a trashy site it is. First they allow The Period Collective (Booth's creation) to run around dictating who gets to stay and then they review creative works by creatively retarded engineers and tell them they are geniuses. This site is connected to a trailer that is set on fire by a fart and a match. As for Booth, he needs to read the “Phantom Tollbooth” cause his likeness is in that book. The Humbug of course. He shares said character with his Period Collective. If you go in the Faux Agent thread their suggestions are so vague the people who use the help are better off getting help from a blind-deaf man. Not to mention Booth is the King of Liars on Authonomy. He probably spit cleans his crown.

Ferret

She is the LY-ADVERB Queen. This is not something you'd want to be. Read her first page of “Zamorna”. Replace all the LY-ADVERBS with LIKE and you'll read how obnoxious it is to use them so often. She might as well stamp California Dolt on her forehead and be done with it. If you do risk your time reading her book, note how talented she is if she didn't over use LY-ADVERBS. Talk about silting your writing wrist and bleeding all over the place. Good EMO GOD. It's no wonder she agreed name the group the Period Collective. It's her favorite state of mind. She barely can think for herself without the man taking the lead for her. It's pretty sad that the Woman's Movement happened and she spits in its face by following the lead of John Booth and his urinal buddy Richard Matiland. Don't trust her opinion, it can't come without being allowed. So you might as well never listen to her.

Bev Allen

Speaking of follower...Bev Allen. If you knew her you'd nod your head. She is a follower through and through. Read her opinions in the Faux Agent thread. All she has the ability to do is agree with her Period Collective cohorts. “Undiscovered Ends” reads like an unsure child with spacial problems. Read this: “Some large insect had found its way into the depths of one of the woven baskets which stood decoratively on a shelf behind the candidate and the resulting deep drone and soft thuds added to the tension filling the room.” That's one long sentence that might as well have been written by a kindergartner who just went camping over the summer. If one said that's who wrote it, I'd buy it as good writing. But when I'm told someone who is older than dirt on my kicks from kindergarten, then I'm disappointed in how people of today lower their standards on what is good writing.

Jack Cerro

He creates a thread that's for faux agents, but what he attracts are the most self absorbed critiquers on the entire site. If one read his work they'd guess him as an archaeologist cause his writing is as dusty as they come. Read this:

     “Luisa Ramirez is nineteen, immortal, and living in Jazz Age Miami. Some would consider it paradise, but for Luisa, it is more like paradise lost. Centuries have passed since her galleon washed up in the lagoon. Too many of her loved ones have grown old and died. She can no longer bear to be the custodian of their memories.
     So when Luisa falls in love with Anastasia, she is determined to free herself from her immortality, and live a single lifetime with the woman she loves. But Luisa’s life is not hers to give. She is bound to the nymph who once guarded the Fountain of Youth. Only by finding the nymph, and returning her to the Fountain, can Luisa become mortal again.
     Standing in her way is Miami’s other immortal citizen, Juan Ponce De Leon. He has claimed the Fountain, for his own, and will not relinquish his prize without a fight.”

Boring only covers all of it, but lame sums it all up. He mentions paradise twice in back to back sentences. That's bad. He should have started with the most interesting part of the entire wordy pitch...and that would be “Bound to a nymph that once guarded the Fountain of Youth, Luisa Ramirez lives a life that is not hers.” and went on from there. But because his friends SUCK at being creative, he is stuck with the above trite mess and accepts it as great. What a hapless moron. He chooses to be this way out of his lack of social skills that could afford him the ability to pick people to befriend who'd help him grow as a writer. Instead he's retard his instincts that has tricked him into believing those who post in the Faux Agent thread have his best interest at heart.

Cariad

How is “Stones” number 26 if not for whoring herself out? It's not because of the writing, that's for sure.

Read this: “Coo’s alcoholic brother Sam has died and her family is falling apart. Unable to speak of her own role in his death, or forgive her parents for failing to protect her, she is searching for a lifeline.”

That sentence is so convoluted that it's no wonder her post read as if she's some sort of malnourished handi-uncapable loser. That and she tries way too hard to be passive aggressive. She's so unreasonable in her idea of what is good writing she likes Richard Maitland's writing and opinions. She needs to get out more. Which is probably why she chose that avatar. She wishes she could leave the confines of her constricting mind. And anyone reading her views on writing knows that she's constricted worse than a boa.

Richard Maitland

I saved the King Douchebag for last. Not last as in I'm not doing any more, just last for this post. He needs to bring up the rear in someone's view, cause he's so into being first that humble is something this STD ridden guy can't catch. And by STD I mean Super Trite Douchebag. The moment you can point out where Richard admits to being wrong on writing is a moment one can call into question him being a douchebag. Until then, he's a douchebag. And by douchebag I mean DOUCHEBAG. The fact that he's British and hides his writing (in the crap closet) only makes him a ginormous douchebag that if NASA wanted to (but can't because Obama killed it), they could see him from space. He's a douchebag that all other douchebags look up to. Shockingly he does have writing up. Not that one can prove he wrote any of that. I wouldn't be shocked if someone proved him to be a plagiarizer. No one who posts asinine post like his could possibly have written anything worthy of being read. Not to mention he posts more lies than a liar at a lying convention.

Considering:

 “Spanning 4,000 years and most of infinity and beyond, The Sex Stone of Agassia involves an extensive cast of bumbling policemen, impoverished aristocrats, Bedouin tribesmen, cantankerous aunts, FBI agents, lost babies, obsessive inventors, red-neck sheriffs, Luftwaffe officers, homesick extraterrestrials, despots, goatherds, and well-endowed vicars.”

It reads like a cliché had sex with a cliché and then had sex with a cliché only after having sex with a cliché and then after all this sex birthed a big, fat, nasty, gross, greasy, fart of a cliché. With all his chest puffing he does the forum over, how can he write something so dumb? Because he's a douchebag.

On a wonderful closing note:

If you dare to venture to Authonomy beware of the idiots. They were kind enough to show themselves in this thread.  Of course that's not all of them, but that's a good chunk of them. If these people are who agents pick to publish books...well, there's no wonder why the publishing world is failing. Any group of people that claim to be mature that speak of others in this manner are neither mature nor sane. They are, however, selfish, uncouth, prattling fools. And anyone listening to anything they have to offer will lose not only a good chunk of their life, but be dumber for it.

You've been warned.

Until next time when I post about more liars that lie like dogs under a porch in the deep south.

Broken All Up In The News

The following stories are brought to you by broken. Broken being what happens to those that cannot function like a normal human being. News is proliferated with broken people.

People are broken. How do you not know that you lost your child in your car? How do you not hear that the rear door opened? How do you not hear the rear door shut? How do you not hear what you’re supposed to love with all your heart fall out of your moving car? How can you call yourself a mother?

Seriously? What is wrong with people? I know what’s wrong with people and you can fall a small part of that on forums in how people interact with one another. Especially writing forums like Authonomy that has broken, downright retarded British people. I’m going to harp on that until I feel they’ve been bloodied enough. And it hasn’t been enough. Yet. Probably never.

Speaking of broken:

People’s signing at karaoke bars suck to begin with, but shooting someone because you didn’t like what they sang? Now that’s just down right retarded.

If karaoke was graded on a life or death scale, then there would be a lot of deaths. A graveyard full of death.  The entire-population-of-Japan dead.

The Promotional Suck: Websites

A list of people, websites and things that I think suck. I'll link and promote them. If people like some things on the list, okay. That's where the promotional aspect comes into play. The people who are on the list will have to acknowledge that I've helped in their promotion. The fact that they'll know that I've helped is good enough for me.

Why? Because if I promote those that think I hate them, they have to admit I helped people find them. And even if they don't admit it, the fact that people found them through me makes this an awesome idea.

If a website backs writers that attack other writers, then that's not a website to post on. The following websites allow writers to be attacked by mobs and do nothing about it:

http://absolutewrite.com/forums/

http://www.writingforums.org/

http://www.authonomy.com/

These websites swear to care about writers. The only writers they care about are the ones that are witless bores. Where is the website that cares about writers being writers instead of caring about writers being confined to rules that promote one type of writer: the moron kind.

Speaking of morons the following websites came to mind:

www.current.com

www.opposingviews.com

They are liberal ran websites that only wish to promote one boring, uncooked idea. I know, it's redundant to say liberal and uncooked idea. I apologize.

Next I'll go into a more personal opinions on certain writers. There is a rule that you shouldn't do that, but if they can go on the above websites and spread lies...then so can I.  

Promotional Suck PrePost

This is to wet the appetite of those that snoop around my blogs just to see what I will say next. I'm going to compile a list of SUCK that I have found the internet over. In this wonderful list I will include websites and posters on said websites. I will link to websites and the posters' profiles. I will mention why they suck and on what level their suckiness is. If they so happen to become more popular due to my Promotional Suck idea, so be it. The idea isn't ruin them, but to enlighten people of who sucks and why.

This is going to be very therapeutic.

Authonomy Sucks!

Authonomy is a website that is supposedly for writers. Instead it's a website that would rather cater to mob rule and ban anyone that doesn't abide by the rule of a mob or a gang. Have you ever lived in a neighborhood ran by a gang? It's chaotic. They don't have set rules and it's confusing. That's how Authonomy is ran. 

Authonomy sends this me this email without stating the problem: 

Your behaviour on the site has been flagged as abusive.
The Authonomy team tries to take a reasonably hands-off approach to moderation. However, racist, offensive, and irrelevant comments and messages will not be tolerated, nor will any flagrant exploitation of the Authonomy system. If this behaviour persists we will be forced to delete your account.

---------------------

That's confusing. You can't tell someone they did something wrong without saying what it is they did wrong. 

First of all when a person or a website states that they're reasonable it's 99% accurate that they are not. If you have to state you are reasonable, you're not. If reasonable isn't shown in your actions, stating it isn't going to make it so. Duh.

Second, when you say “However” or “but” you negate the previous statement. Meaning they just stated that they were reasonable only to state that they're not. Which would be more truthful.

Third, “forced” is waste word. No one forces you to do anything. CHOICE. You choose to do it.

Anyway after that dumb email from a website claiming to be for writers from a country that has SKINS on its TV set. A show that has more foul language than most movies and they are going to whine over what? I don't know. They do not answer what was wrong. That's another reason why they are NOT reasonable. Reasonable people have a reason for doing something. When you offer no reason for doing something, you are not reasonable.

Reasonable people also give warnings. They gave no warning.

------------

As per our terms and conditions, we have the right to remove any member whose activity is deemed offensive or inappropriate. Following previous warnings about your use of the Authonomy site, your behaviour has continued to be deemed abusive. As such, we have now closed your account and all content will be lost.

-------------

There were no previous warnings. More proof Authonomy is NOT reasonable.

What was abusive? The reasonable Authonomy didn't have an answer. Typical lairs. Say you are reasonable and when asked what's the problem, ignore it. Just so these “writers” know...that's not reasonable

They state that the banning happened because of abuse. Which is a lie shown by their next email:

------------

Your deletion was based on an accumulation of complaints, and not on the actions or requests of any one member. We reserve the right to remove any personality that is causing disruption in the forums.

------------

“An accumulation of complaints” which means they were upset over how many people complained over NOTHING than someone breaking a rule.

What rule was broken? None. They were upset that enough people complained. And who were the complainers?

The Period Collective

That's another creative way of saying pack of demonic wolves. They tend to go about their business as “kindhearted” people until you disagree with them. And then they come in one at a time to tell you that you can't tell them they're wrong. They rile themselves up to make it appear as if they have some justifiable reason for being douchebags of the British order. Oh yes, some of them might not be British. (and though they like to be called the English...that's the reason why they take the douchebag cake and eat it, too.) But to emulate British people is pretty pathetic when they can't even begin to take what they give.

John Stewart said  they have all that trash on their TV and yet you can't mock the Parliament? That's cause they take themselves far too seriously. What kind of “freedom” is that? The country that allows SKINS on TV creates a website that gets pissy when someone has a difference of opinion.

These are the The Period Collective

Richard Maitland

John Booth

Farret

Brooklyn Writer

R A S

Cariad

Bev Allen

Patrick Whittaker

mindrose

Jack Cerro

Tom B

Not Really There

Shakespeare's Talking Head

Eric Laing

William Holt

Dadoo

JD Revene

Groaner

Rob1969 - - Don't be fooled by the helping hand in the avatar. If that were true, he wouldn't hang around the above.

If you disagree with any of them or they'll band together and try to remove you from the website. They'll try and convince you otherwise. Don't trust them.

Why would you want to be on a website that is ran by a mob? Authonomy said it themselves...if enough people complain they control the website. How is that right?

Richcard Maitland and John Booth are saddlebags (cause they got nasty skin). They go around telling others what they are and can't handle when the tables are turned.

Email Authonomy and tell them that Richard Maitland and John Booth have offended you. If enough people do it Authonomy will ban them. I'm sure they've got that one warning already.

Most likely they won't be ban and that's because they are favorites. They say worse things than anyone and yet here they sit prattling their preorations and no one says anything about the double standard. They are perfidious about what they've done and have done in life and yet everyone gobbles up what they say. I'm sure there are 40 more posters out there that have had a run in with them and find it disheartening that a website that wants to promote writing would allow Richard Maitland and John Booth to post. They don't even have evidence that they know how to write. Posting is as much proof of a great writer as debate is of a great President/Leader.

I already have 40 people willing to email. The more the merrier. Their email address: Authonomy@harpercollins.co.uk

Will the website abide by its made up rules or do as cowards do and show favoritism?

The problem isn't banning, it's banning under the guise of not following the rules when actuality the rule is whoever they don't like. Which is also fine...but they don't let people know that up front. They try to hide that aspect.

Essentially if you say you breathe to live and someone says you don't and you insist that you do...if that person can get enough people to complain about you Authonomy will ban you for offending them complainer.

The first reaction to this post by the Period Collective (and their allies) will be to mock it and make a big joke over what's said. For those of you who are new, these are the people to avoid at all cost. Why? Because if you are of the mindset that sharing your opinion is valuable, these are the people not to hold court with. If they don't like what you have to say they will gather together and vote you out. And not because you broke any rule (Because they break them constantly by calling people stupid, just read their post when they get into arguments...troll is the same thing as stupid. Anyone using that term is most likely ignorant on what it actually means and essentially misuses it.)

If your reaction can be categorized by the following you are the problem:

1. Turning it into a big joke.
2. Mocking it.
3. Calling names.
4. Using the word troll in a snooty British manner.
5. Being mad you're called British and not English.--hence the SNOOTY.
6. Unable to address the points in this post with any reason outside of immature grumbling.
7. Anyone that thinks ignoring is a proper course of action, but thinks passive aggressive action is part of ignoring.
8. Anyone who watches British Television and isn't offended, but once online loses that thick skin and all the sudden things start to offend them. Could be because they be thin skinned and a hypocrite.
9. If you defend using ly adverbs because your writing is that poor.
10. Stating that they are proud to be on the list.
11. And finally nitpick over how I decide to type things.