Authonomy is a website that is supposedly for writers. Instead it's a website that would rather cater to mob rule and ban anyone that doesn't abide by the rule of a mob or a gang. Have you ever lived in a neighborhood ran by a gang? It's chaotic. They don't have set rules and it's confusing. That's how Authonomy is ran.
Authonomy sends
this me this email without stating the problem:
Your behaviour on the site has been flagged as abusive.
The Authonomy team tries to take a reasonably hands-off approach to moderation. However, racist, offensive, and irrelevant comments and messages will not be tolerated, nor will any flagrant exploitation of the Authonomy system. If this behaviour persists we will be forced to delete your account.
---------------------
That's confusing. You can't tell someone they did something wrong without saying what it is they did wrong.
First of all when
a person or a website states that they're reasonable it's 99%
accurate that they are not. If you have to state you are reasonable,
you're not. If reasonable isn't shown in your actions, stating it
isn't going to make it so. Duh.
Second, when you
say “However” or “but” you negate the previous statement.
Meaning they just stated that they were reasonable only to state that
they're not. Which would be more truthful.
Third, “forced”
is waste word. No one forces you to do anything. CHOICE. You choose
to do it.
Anyway after that
dumb email from a website claiming to be for writers from a country
that has SKINS on its TV set. A show that has more foul language than
most movies and they are going to whine over what? I don't know. They
do not answer what was wrong. That's another reason why they are NOT
reasonable. Reasonable people have a reason for doing something. When
you offer no reason for doing something, you are not reasonable.
Reasonable people
also give warnings. They gave no warning.
------------
As per our terms and conditions, we have the right to remove any member whose activity is deemed offensive or inappropriate. Following previous warnings about your use of the Authonomy site, your behaviour has continued to be deemed abusive. As such, we have now closed your account and all content will be lost.
-------------
There were no
previous warnings. More proof Authonomy is NOT reasonable.
What was abusive?
The reasonable Authonomy didn't have an answer. Typical lairs. Say
you are reasonable and when asked what's the problem, ignore it. Just
so these “writers” know...that's not reasonable
They state that
the banning happened because of abuse. Which is a lie shown by their
next email:
------------
Your deletion was based on an accumulation of complaints, and not on the actions or requests of any one member. We reserve the right to remove any personality that is causing disruption in the forums.
------------
“An accumulation
of complaints” which means they were upset over how many people
complained over NOTHING than someone breaking a rule.
What rule was
broken? None. They were upset that enough people complained. And who
were the complainers?
The Period Collective
That's
another creative way of saying pack of demonic wolves. They tend to
go about their business as “kindhearted” people until you
disagree with them. And then they come in one at a time to tell you
that you can't tell them they're wrong. They rile themselves up to
make it appear as if they have some justifiable reason for being
douchebags of the British order. Oh yes, some of them might not be
British. (and though they like to be called the English...that's the
reason why they take the douchebag cake and eat it, too.) But to
emulate British people is pretty pathetic when they can't even begin
to take what they give.
John
Stewart said
they have all that trash on their TV and yet you can't mock the
Parliament? That's cause they take themselves far too seriously. What
kind of “freedom” is that? The country that allows SKINS on TV
creates a website that gets pissy when someone has a difference of
opinion.
Richard Maitland
John Booth
Farret
Brooklyn Writer
R A S
Cariad
Bev Allen
Patrick Whittaker
mindrose
Jack Cerro
Tom B
Not Really There
Shakespeare's Talking Head
Eric Laing
William Holt
Dadoo
JD Revene
Groaner
Rob1969 - - Don't be fooled by the
helping hand in the avatar. If that were true, he wouldn't hang
around the above.
If you disagree with any of them or
they'll band together and try to remove you from the website. They'll
try and convince you otherwise. Don't trust them.
Why would you want to be on a website
that is ran by a mob? Authonomy said it themselves...if enough people
complain they control the website. How is that right?
Richcard Maitland and John Booth are
saddlebags (cause they got nasty skin). They go around telling others
what they are and can't handle when the tables are turned.
Email Authonomy and tell them that
Richard Maitland and John Booth have offended you. If enough people
do it Authonomy will ban them. I'm sure they've got that one warning
already.
Most likely they won't be ban and
that's because they are favorites. They say worse things than anyone
and yet here they sit prattling their preorations and no one says
anything about the double standard. They are perfidious about what
they've done and have done in life and yet everyone gobbles up what
they say. I'm sure there are 40 more posters out there that have had
a run in with them and find it disheartening that a website that
wants to promote writing would allow Richard Maitland and John Booth
to post. They don't even have evidence that they know how to write.
Posting is as much proof of a great writer as debate is of a great
President/Leader.
I already have 40 people willing to
email. The more the merrier. Their email address:
Authonomy@harpercollins.co.uk
Will the website abide by its made up
rules or do as cowards do and show favoritism?
The problem isn't banning, it's banning
under the guise of not following the rules when actuality the rule is
whoever they don't like. Which is also fine...but they don't let
people know that up front. They try to hide that aspect.
Essentially if you say you breathe to
live and someone says you don't and you insist that you do...if that
person can get enough people to complain about you Authonomy will ban
you for offending them complainer.
The first reaction to this post by the
Period Collective (and their allies) will be to mock it and make a
big joke over what's said. For those of you who are new, these are
the people to avoid at all cost. Why? Because if you are of the
mindset that sharing your opinion is valuable, these are the people
not to hold court with. If they don't like what you have to say they
will gather together and vote you out. And not because you broke any
rule (Because they break them constantly by calling people stupid,
just read their post when they get into arguments...troll is the same
thing as stupid. Anyone using that term is most likely ignorant on
what it actually means and essentially misuses it.)
If your reaction can be categorized by
the following you are the problem:
- Turning it into a big joke.
- Mocking it.
- Calling names.
- Using the word troll in a snooty British manner.
- Being mad you're called British and not English.--hence the SNOOTY.
- Unable to address the points in this post with any reason outside of immature grumbling.
- Anyone that thinks ignoring is a proper course of action, but thinks passive aggressive action is part of ignoring.
- Anyone who watches British Television and isn't offended, but once online loses that thick skin and all the sudden things start to offend them. Could be because they be thin skinned and a hypocrite.
- If you defend using ly adverbs because your writing is that poor.
- Stating that they are proud to be on the list.
- And finally nitpick over how I decide to type things.
No comments:
Post a Comment