Pebble into Jupiter by Nate the CondescenKing

Joey Graceffa is a YouTuber whose personality is a magnet attracting people to view his videos about his life. He uses words like SLUT which causes some people to feign insulted. OHNOSE, he calls people names. Something people never, ever do…ever. Woopty-do. I call people whores. It’s like saying someone’s stupid. Sometimes you mean it. Sometimes you’re being facetious.

Nate Clark is one of those feigners.

Joey’s video talking about his car being stolen vs Nate’s feigning over being insulted and why he’s jealous.

If you’re wondering how to create Jupiter from a pebble, ask Nate. If you’re wondering how to make the best tasting lemonade you’ve ever had, ask Joey. He made that comment after several thousand insults that ranged from Joey being gay to Joey needing to kill himself (who knows how many he read or if he read any at all). He had one single response with a well-placed grin. It comes from this video. 

Joey has a great sense of humor that’s shown in how he reacts to being towed. I work with a tow company, and tow trucks call cops to inform them of a tow, because owners automatically think that their car was stolen. A natural reaction.

If someone is talking about you and you don’t appreciate it, you pull them aside and tell them you don’t appreciate it. You don’t collect everyone into the Town Square and announce that you hate the person with a condescending tone. A douchebag would and, like Nate, make a video claiming they were insulted. Not to mention having every right to get the car towed.

First let me take the “insulting.”  In order to insult someone, you have to actually use their name or use some form of subtly that indicates the person. If you don’t indicate who it is, then you’re speaking in generalities. People do that when they’re in the car, and someone cuts them off. They scream a name at them, toss up their hands or do some vile gesture. The reaction to the cutting off isn’t personal. It’s an in general reaction to the abrupt situation.

Nate attacked Joey specifically. Nate said Joey’s name. Nate talked down to Joey without a hint of subtly as if Joey wasn’t any smarter than trash at the bottom of his high horse’s hooves. Nate sharing Joey’s income was a douchebag move because that’s what douchebags do. He tried rallying everyone to target the person he’s targeted. This garnered Nate a lot of attention. Something he really, really wanted.  What better way to get that attention than taking on someone that has a lot of subscribers? Not only take Joey on through kicking him like a bum a snooty person hates, but have your video posted to Reddit and 4Chan and other whore sites so as to get attention for your supposedly altruistic deed.

Now about the right to tow. You have no right to tow. That’s because you have no right to drive. You have no right to a car. You have no right to a house. You have no right to a driveway. A right is equal to not having to purchase. It’s already yours. Such as free speech. You don’t have to purchase that. Making it yours. It’s a right. In order for Nate to have the right to tow he’d have to have been given the car, the house and the entire driveway without a single dime in payment to anyone, even the government via taxes. Actually we’d have to all be given that without payment for it to be a right. Since that ain’t happening, it’s not a right.

So, Nate didn’t have the right to tow. He had the legal right to tow…which is not the same as having the right to tow. Legal is used in court. It doesn’t matter elsewhere. Confused? Let me enlighten you with some historical facts. Legally cities were allowed to separate blacks and whites on buses, restaurants, restrooms, hospitals and such. Legally you can be arrested if you’re 18 for having sex with a 17 year-old (no matter if you’re boyfriend and girlfriend) and be charged with statutory rape AND be on the sex offenders list. Legally women were not allowed to vote. Legal isn’t a good argument for right/correct/without fault. Legal is only an argument in court, not for making a YouTube video demeaning someone so you can get attention, Nate.

Nate is a douchebag CondescenKing. There’s no two ways around his egotistical, inflated head. With people like that, they need a mob to nod in agreement in order to feel validated in what they believe no matter if it’s a lie. A mob. A zombie horde. A Borg collective. Whatever you call it, that’s what Nate needed. And got. Each thumb-up was proof people cannot think for themselves, let alone separate themselves from the bully. Nate is a bully. Proof’s in the creation of the video. The question that needs to be answered is what was Nate’s endgame? What did he want to accomplish with this video? If it’s the attention he got, (which it was) then he was being a bully. If it’s to embarrass Joey, (which it was) then he was being a bully. If it was to come off smarter than anyone who thought he was a douchebag, then he was being a douchebag.

It doesn’t matter if Joey parked illegally. That, in no way, justifies what Nate created…a sardonic storm of brutish, pernicious malice that tried to rain on Joey’s pleasant personality that has harmed no one in any of his videos. Something Nate cannot ever say.

Finally saying that you enjoyed the video because Nate made you laugh is, quite simply, backing a douchebag. In order to suggest that the video was done with humorous intent, it would have to be proven that laughter is the only viable reaction to the video. It isn’t as proven by the previous paragraphs as well as the posts in both videos’ comment sections. Nate didn’t create the video to tell people to attack Joey, but he’s never denounced any of the vicious comments that were made in his video comment section or that of Joey’s. Meaning he agrees with the insults. One cannot say the same about Joey’s fans, because Joey’s video didn’t name Nate or insult him personally. The fans of Joey were reacting to what Nate did and what his lovers had posted. If Nate never made a video, Joey’s fans wouldn’t have ever known who Joey was talking about and therefore couldn’t make any comments about Nate or his lovers.

Speaking of people that back Nate’s video because they laughed… Phillip DeFranco Show’s view on it  – this is only relevant because of the hypocrisy. You cannot be for NOT bullying, but be okay with it when it’s a byproduct of a video you endorse because you chuckled at what you claim is clever (even though it’s far from it). Nate’s video could not produce good. No reality that spans the space time continuum would have a good outcome of this douchebag CondescenKing’s video. Backing it is backing the comments that were tossed out against Joey. And that’s why Phil is wrong. I mostly disagree with him on several billion things because he’s too mushy and less logical, but his show is well done and enjoyable. Especially when he’s not talking about political things he doesn’t really get.

Tre C. B.’s response is the kind of clever Nate was trying to go for, but failed epically. And I can say that because when you get viral like Nate’s video, it’s not because it’s clever, it’s because it was mean enough for the simple minded to latch on to. Ooh if it was truly clever, it would take people a moment to actually appreciate what’s going on instead of going OMG ooh snap. When you say ooh snap, yeah…it’s as clever as a your mama joke. Which isn’t clever.

If you leave with anything that improves you, leave with the view of abstaining from group think. Don’t ever be in a group that’s jeering an individual to the brink of asking them to kill themselves. No one deserves to be attacked by a mob no matter what they’ve done. Justice has never been handled at the hand of an angry group of people. Not one single time in all of history can you name such a moment. Don’t be historically stupid.

Can I post here? Why…yes I can. 

Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins!

Should the Washington Redskins change their name? No.

Why?

I'm half Japanese and half Irish. People that get Japanese characters tattooed on their body are offensive. If you can't speak the language, don't desecrate it by placing it on your sagging boob, poorly developed tricep or that torso that used to look better when you swam in high school twenty dozen moons ago.

Fighting Irish is offensive. I don't fight everyone. I hate when I tell someone I'm half Irish and they ask me if I want to fight and when I say no, they ask if that's the Japanese side speaking. Morons are offensive. Put them all in a concentration camp and gas them. Get a bunch of lactose intolerant people to crop-dust, it'll save on money.

While we're on the topic of what offends me, let me say how awful the term WHITE House is. As half white I find the name of said house fully vile. It's not really white anyway. It's like flat white and everyone knows flat makes everything useless. Flat chest. Flat butt. Flat crotch. All kinds of uselessness in those. Go ahead and count the ways.

Are we still on the topic of offensive? Yes, because it's my article. New Orleans Pelicans. Seriously? Totally offends my creativity. Get rid of it.

UNCF is offensive because of the N-word. It is a N-word, but is it THE N-word? I don't care. All N-words are offensive. Nothing good starts with N.

What else is offensive enough to change so I don't have to deal with it? I'm pissing out a Mississippi River of whining. It's a torrent of asparagus smelling raging spray. Except I haven't eaten any asparagus. The taste offends me.

Speaking of taste: Eskimo pies. Sounds like cow pies. That's just awful. Why would anyone name something in a similar light? Like gross twins. Evil, I tell you. Just evil.

Urbandictionary.com is offensive. Anyone with any sense of moral right knows that. SHUT IT DOWN. They should be renamed to Nutsandberriesdictionary.com. Totally on point. Since PeTA thinks it should be the Washington Potatoskins. Considering how intelligent and smart PeTA is, I don't understand why anyone would deem that a stupid suggestion.

On the topic of stupid suggestions…actually nah. I've grown bored of this topic. But before I go I will give a list of things that are offensive and if you don't know why, it doesn't matter. Your opinion doesn't matter. Only those that are offended matter and as you sit all comfortable knowing you are okay with certain things, your world will change because all it takes is a militant (with weapons or ideas) minority to destroy everything due to them being offended.

If Washington Redskins changes because of pressure to do so, what's stopping these angry little Indians from going around causing more ruckus elsewhere?

Indiana. The state. Look it up.

Atlanta Braves. Really? You think they're safe?

Kansas City Chiefs. Not safe either no matter what your little liberal wet blankets say.

Cleveland Indians. Yap.

Los Angeles Angels. Oh, sorry, if you're a Christian you can't be offended. Pardon me.

Minnesota Vikings. Hahaha, right. White people can't be offended. Never.

Dallas Cowboys. Same as above. What was I thinking?

Giving in to people who are offended is like calling a personal foul in basketball for a player that is always faking hurt…always falling on the ground seconds before they're touched…sliding across the floor in agony, but able to get up and shoot those shots for some points. Allowing the offendants to get their way when they're not even really hurt allows them get their way when they're not even really hurt. So these offendants know they can do it again. And again. And again. And again.

And those that sit by nodding their head that this is so offensive and awful and that Indians should be listened to, well…your world sucks. Must be really difficult to walk around on eggshells all the time offending PeTA (the master offendants) as you kill unborn chickens, not to mention vegans (offendants to the nth) don't necessarily like you either. Neither do I. Clean up your eggshells and go home.

Reddit

Reddit is fun, until you hit places like /r/politics where echo chamber was born. It's one of the worst places on the internet. Seriously, how could anyone get any real info off /r/politics? They can't.

You might ask Reddit what they're about and they'd lie. Read this instead. Reddit. 

And a great breakdown (though old) of what the subreddits are like. 

Authonomy on Encyclopedia Dramatica

Oh I laughed a good laugh reading this.

I'm not the only one that has a list of douchebags from that site.

The Gay Hitler's Idiot's Guide to Tolerance

I'm not supposed to mention Hitler in a debate because of a douchebag named Godwin who egotistically named a law after himself. Too bad. Not mentioning Hitler allows people to act like him and not get called out on it. It's amazing that Dan Savage cares enough to tell those who are bullied for their sexuality that “things get better” and yet when things don't get better quick enough for him, he calls on the power of Hitler (as if Hitler were Captain Planet) to vent his frustration. His speech was very similar to how Hitler spoke about different view points. How they are vile and need to be removed.

I bet if a group of atheists went around burning Churches Gay Hitler (Dan Savage) would look the other way. Just like the women groups ignore any crude comment that is made about conservative women. And on that rare occasion that they stand up for conservative women, they do it with a caveat of how they don't agree with them. No one asked if you agreed with them. The pejorative term used is what needs discussed, not if the person is upstanding in your opinion. Quite frankly anyone who claims to fight for one group of people are bias losers anyway, so no one should want them in their corner. They are not looking out for your best interest. They are looking out for the best interest of the group. They make matters worse. Like GLAAD. Or PeTA. Or NAACP.

If Gay Hitler (Dan Savage) really cared about things getting better, then he would treat others who have different view points...better. He wouldn't care what's believed unless those that believe (such as WBC [those wonderful people that Freedom Caring Canada ban from entering their country...just another liberal hypocrite in action] who spout hateful things during funerals) are trying to destroy people. Then it's worth standing up against and telling them they are being vile because they are going directly against the teachings of Christ about love.

Instead Gay Hitler (now I don't have to say his name...connection) decides to preach to high school journalist about what he hates. Now that's how to show tolerance. He should write an idiot's guide. He didn't allow them to speak up for what they believe in. He decided to scream at them and call them names for choosing to walk out on his tirade. That is what the left always wants. Why don't you turn the other cheek. That they did and yet the left still went after them. I say the left because they are defending his vile actions because they love to hate.

Liberals swear they're tolerant and then they back a Gay Hitler, totally destroying this idea they care about how others are treated. I suppose they only care if those who are mistreated are those who think just like them. It is best to only stand up for those that agree with you, because that's how to be tolerant. So says the Gay Hitler's Idiot's Guide to being Tolerant.

I'm not even going to get into the fact that Gay Hitler misused the Bible through his childish rant about how he didn't like a book that he doesn't believe in because it doesn't like his lifestyle choice. He honestly believes that there should be a law saying everyone has to love all gay people or you'll be hated on by the tolerant left. That Idiot's Guide is writing itself. They are not all likeable. Therefore they don't deserve to be liked just because they're gay. It's not like Gay Hitler likes Christians. He displays in that video that he hates them. For someone to advocate that tolerance is the answer to show intolerance is painfully funny. Idiot's Guide Gold.

And if you want everyone to like you, Gay Hitler, you are in for a rude awakening. For you it no longer gets better. After this, it gets worse and that's not because Christians are (as you suggest) intolerant due to their beliefs. It's because you're intolerant due to your hate. It's because of people like you that gays have it rough. You are not likeable, which is exactly what you need to be when you are promoting tolerance.  

Current TV Failure

And it looks like their business practices are catching up to them and Current TV will eventually fail. And I will be there to laugh in their face.  Because they suck and failure is all they will ever be good at.

Will320069 is a dirty Old Man

I have posted on www.student.com forums since 2004.

Ever since I said that Will320069  flirts with girls who were underage, he was out to get me. If I weren't telling the truth he wouldn't have to attack me. He'd just have to let the evidence speak for itself. I only said it once and I said it to someone in private. But he couldn't do that. Search his screen name and you'll see that he flirts with girls. A lot. Right now the pickings are slim and there are no young ones he can swindle with his nasty words, so you won't find anything recently. And most of his nasty comments have go away due to how the website removes posts after a certain amount of inactivity. But I did search and found some that are good enough, but not as bad as he had gotten at one point.

When you're 28 and flirt with a girl that's 19, that's creepy. He flirted with girls that were 16 when he was 22. That's disgusting. If you find nothing wrong with that, well you don't have a daughter or you're just as dirty as Will. There is no reason for a 22 year old to flirt with a 16 year old girl online in front of the world. If that's what he said in public, one shouldn't even imagine what he said in private.

I wouldn't be surprised if Will had a record. But that's not something Jeff checks into when he hires mods.

Jeff is the owner and he could care less about how mods treat anyone. It took him ages to realize that a certain mod by the name of Adam was bad. He was told that Adam was bad. But he didn't do anything about it and Adam went on a tirade and deleted so much stuff that it most likely forced some posters to leave.

In 2005 the forums were bustling with new people and it was fun.

In 2005 Darphabobo took a prank too far and because he quoted me in the forums Jeff blamed me for something someone else did. It didn't matter if I said I didn't do it. It didn't matter I had nothing to do with it. It didn't matter that he had no proof or that what proof he had came from Will who had a history of not liking guys who stood up to him. This is why he doesn't talk to any guy. As long as he can control their thinking and keep them thinking he's smart, then he'll speak with them. That's why the two mods in BS are mods with him. They'll abide by how he runs things and won't think for themselves. And if you search their names on the BS forum, you'll see that they never confront Will when he's being dirty, nasty old man.

In 2006 Jeff allowed another crazy person to run around and do and say whatever he wanted. Seren_dipity  and in February he deleted an entire thread that was 10,000 pages under his boyfriend's (Sn0wman) profile name that was mod at the time. Neither Sn0wman or Seren_dipity got into trouble for their actions. That's a big thing on a forum...deleting people's posts in mass.

Jeff has a knack for befriending crazy people online and acting as if they're not crazy.

There was a poster by the name of Phoenix_89 who told everyone he was 16. He wasn't 16. He was more like 14 or something and he got to be mod and friends with Jeff. When it came out he lied, Jeff didn't care. And if he did, he didn't do anything about it.

I say that because whenever he was upset with me, the entire site knew because he couldn't help but spread it around like herpes.

Then there's Crosstheline who told everyone that he was a boy only years later to find out that he was a she the entire time. That's not a big deal if she told the truth the first time, but she lied and she was mod and she was friends with Jeff and Jeff didn't do anything about that one either. Not to mention a guy like him as a guy and then liked him as a girl. Go figure that one. Someone lies like that you gotta be a loon to fall for them.

Under all that crazy, I have great reason to question why Jeff gets upset over anything that I do. He couldn't list one thing that he's ever gotten upset with me over that is remotely close to what the above people have done or continue to do.

When he tells me I've said something wrong, I've asked what is wrong with what I've said. He doesn't ever have an answer outside how it makes other people feel. The question then is who made them think like that? Who trained them that it as okay to treat me like that? Jeff. He is upset with me because people view me as he wants them to view me? Exactly how is that my fault? How is that not retarded? How hard is it to tell people to get over not liking an opinion? He's babied several posters and now he has a site that's mainly brats.

This is another liberal ran website that tries and shuts people down if the owners don't agree with them. How can they seriously go about their lives claiming to want equality and fair treatment of people when they can't even do that on a simple little webiste?

If you profess that you're one thing (such as tolerant), most likely you're not.

When you accept the behavior you find abhorrent only because the behavior is against whom you dislike…it makes you the problem you abhorre.

If I were terrible, Jeff would have removed me along with Darph the first go around. But I wasn't terrible. He has some form of guilt for lumping me together with what he knew was wrong and that guilt has ate at him for the longest time and I play on it whenever I can. If I don't, he'll forget how wrong he's been and that cannot be allowed.

This is the man that allowed people to state I was a pedophile without any proof. He just let people say it. He even joined in the conversations. What kind of man runs a “student” website and allows a pedophile on? What kind of website owner for “students” lies about someone being something that they're not? The same kind of person that can't tell if someone's lying to him over gender or age.

Due to trusting the very ones who are negative and intolerant, he’s created a website that bleeds members. The mass exodus happened in the summer of 2006 when he allowed lies about me being a pedophile spread unquestioned and he never, ever redacted it or put those who said it in trouble. Some of them are still mods like Will320069, Greentutrle and for a long while, Bat.

If you go to Random Random or Ran Dumb, you can see how much fun it use to be. It's not totally seen in these threads, because these threads were deleted and the replacements' first few pages are on that topic, but once that passes, you can see how much fun it was. And for a while it lasts until the summer '06 when Jeff and Will320069 create a witch hunt out of nothing for me.

A question is why would I stick around if I was being mistreated? It’s like you finding a home you like and buying it. For years you care for it as your house and can’t think of another place to live. Then one neighbor starts to hate you for no reason. This bully neighbor gathers other neighbors together to hate on you as well. In total there’s five of them causing problems by talking trash about you. They claim no one wants you in the neighborhood any more. There are 100 other people that live there, but most of them are silent. Several don’t speak up. Instead of siding, they decide the peace of the neighborhood is gone, so…so are they. They move. The head of Home Owner’s Association blames you for all the problems, never once considering the bully neighbor as an issue. Anything you say to the bully neighbor is considered as an act of defiance and you are punished for it. After investing so much money and time into your home, do you up and leave or stay and fight?

I'm fighting. And in the next few posts I'll show you want is allowed to stick around while what I say is questioned as crass, mean and hateful.